A 5-Year Study of the Transmalar Subperiosteal Midface Lift with Minimal Skin and Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Dissection：A Durable, Natural-Appearing Lift with Less Surgery and Recovery Time
Finger, E. Ronald M.D.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery：April 15, 2001
Techniques in Cosmetic Surgery：April 15, 2001 - Volume 107 - Issue 5
Abstract
The transmalar subperiosteal midface lift is a simple, direct-approach procedure to be performed with a meloplasty. The entry into the midface is at the site of maximum suture tension, which allows for more elevation. The skin is elevated enough to expose the entry site, which is on the zygoma just cephalad to the origins of the zygomaticus muscles. Through a small hole at that site, a periosteal elevator is used for the midface dissection. This is a blind dissection, and the technique is described. The advantages of the technique are that there is (1) no lowerlid incision or risk of an ectropion, (2) a resultant tightening and elevation of the lower lid, (3) more elevation and durability because the zygomaticus muscle origins are elevated with the periosteum and are sutured to the very substantial deep temporal fascia, (4) a simple and fast procedure, and (5) no telltale sign of a face lift. Both the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) and the skin are substantially elevated with the transmalar subperiosteal midface lift to the extent that they should be only minimally dissected. In the author's opinion, the extended dissection of the skin and/or the SMAS does not increase the amount of tissue lift and probably reduces it in most cases, considering that the goal is a natural look and not one that appears pulled or stretched. The skin is elevated only for exposure, and the SMAS is elevated only enough to create a preauricular SMAS-platysma flap to tighten the neck. With two fewer layers of dissection, there is significantly less postoperative swelling and recovery time. The article presents the technique, the results on 272 patients over a period of 5 years, and a discussion. No patients described have had secondary procedures such as lasers, so the transmalar subperiosteal midface lift can be evaluated on its own merit.
(Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 107: 1273, 2001.)
(C)2001American Society of Plastic Surgeons
留言列表
